I recently started the Book of Mormon over again in audio form while I’m at work. Chapter 6 of 1 Nephi caught my attention and led to some significant thoughts about agency.
And it mattereth not to me that I am particular to give a full account of all the things of my father, for they cannot be written upon these plates, for I desire the room that I may write of the things of God.
For the fulness of mine intent is that I may persuade men to come unto the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and be saved.
Wherefore, the things which are pleasing unto the world I do not write, but the things which are pleasing unto God and unto those who are not of the world.
Wherefore, I shall give commandment unto my seed, that they shall not occupy these plates with things which are not of worth unto the children of men. (1 Nephi 6:3-6)
The limited resources Nephi had forced him to focus on what was most important. He desired to record “the things of God” over things that were pleasing unto the world; think about that. What types of things would be pleasing to the world? What did Nephi deliberately leave out of his record? How is what he did record pleasing to God and “those who are not of the world?”
If he gave that commandment, I wonder how strictly his instructions were followed, particularly by Mormon and Moroni. If they saw our day and the skepticism of people who would not take their record seriously, perhaps they could have put in some deliberate evidences that would please the natural man and leave no room for doubt?
Perhaps God wanted to leave room for doubt because he seems to have intentionally selected weak people to put the Book of Mormon together, weak people who doubted even themselves.
“And I [Moroni] said unto him: Lord, the Gentiles will mock at these things, because of our weakness in writing; for Lord thou hast made us mighty in word by faith, but thou hast not made us mighty in writing; for thou hast made all this people that they could speak much, because of the Holy Ghost which thou hast given them;
And thou hast made us that we could write but little, because of the awkwardness of our hands. Behold, thou hast not made us mighty in writing like unto the brother of Jared, for thou madest him that the things which he wrote were mighty even as thou art, unto the overpowering of man to read them.
Thou hast also made our words powerful and great, even that we cannot write them; wherefore, when we write we behold our weakness, and stumble because of the placing of our words; and I fear lest the Gentiles shall mock at our words. (Moroni 8:23-25)
God seems to be fine with leaving room for doubt as well as providing reasons for faith, but why? LDS authors Terryl and Fiona Givens had an interesting take on this:
“There must be grounds for doubt as well as belief, in order to render the choice more truly a choice and there fore the more deliberate, and laden with personal vulnerability and investment. An overwhelming preponderance of evidence on either side would make our choice as meaningless as would a loaded gun pointed at our heads…
For most of us, at least, there is neither a choir or heavenly heralds proving God exists, nor a laboratory of science equipment proving He doesn’t. Rather, we find a persuasive body of evidence on both sides of life’s competing propositions. Only in the case of use mortals, there is something to tip the scale. There is something to predispose us to a life of faith or a life of disbelief. There is a heart that, in these conditions of equilibrium and balance, equally ‘enticed by one or he other,’ is truly free to choose belief or skepticism, faith or faithlessness.
The call to faith, in this light, is not some test of a coy god, waiting to see if we ‘get it right.’ it is the only summons, issued under the only conditions, which can allow us fully to reveal who we are, what we most love, and what we most devoutly desire. Without constraint, without any form of mental compulsion, the act of belief becomes the freest possible projection of what resides in our hearts.” (The God Who Weeps, pgs. 4-5)
What do you think?
- What role does doubt play in your life, currently?
- What types of doubts trouble you the most?
- What doubts have been replaced with knowledge and surety?
- What was the turning point where doubt was replaced by surety?