Close Menu
  • The One Climbs Show
    • YouTube
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Show Posts
  • Topics
    • All Posts
    • The Book of Mormon
    • Atonement
    • Symbolism
    • Temple Prep
  • Study Tools
    • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
    • Etymology Dictionary
    • Hebrew 4 Christians
    • Lectures on Faith.com
    • LDSSymbols.com
    • Number in Scripture
    • Isaiah Explorer
    • ScriptureNotes
    • Strong’s Condordance
    • The Book of Isaiah (IIT)
    • Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
  • About
    • About oneClimbs
    • Contact
Trending
  • Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed
  • Retaining brightness
  • Sebus, Severed Arms, and Humility Unto Salvation
  • oneClimbs on The Stick of Joseph: Alma’s Sermon
  • What were Nephite “Sanctuaries”?
  • Why the Conventional Interpretation of Jacob 2:30 Falls Short
  • #39 – Insights on Prayer from Incense
  • #38 – Exploring the Greater and Lesser Arches
oneClimbs.comoneClimbs.com
  • The One Climbs Show
    • YouTube
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Show Posts
  • Topics
    • All Posts
    • The Book of Mormon
    • Atonement
    • Symbolism
    • Temple Prep
  • Study Tools
    • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
    • Etymology Dictionary
    • Hebrew 4 Christians
    • Lectures on Faith.com
    • LDSSymbols.com
    • Number in Scripture
    • Isaiah Explorer
    • ScriptureNotes
    • Strong’s Condordance
    • The Book of Isaiah (IIT)
    • Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
  • About
    • About oneClimbs
    • Contact
oneClimbs.comoneClimbs.com
Home»Articles»Justice and Peace as Negative Principles
Articles September 25, 20234 Mins Read

Justice and Peace as Negative Principles

The idea for this came from a Sunday School lesson at church yesterday. We were discussing how to become a peacemaker works and that’s when this idea slipped into my mind.

I brought up how Frederic Bastiat had mentioned how Justice is a negative principle or concept; here’s how he explained it:

As a friend of mine once remarked, this negative concept of law is so true that the statement, the purpose of the law is to cause justice to reign, is not a rigorously accurate statement. It ought to be stated that the purpose of the law is to prevent injustice from reigning. In fact, it is injustice, instead of justice, that has an existence of its own. Justice is achieved only when injustice is absent.

http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html

And peace can be defined this way:

 In a general sense, a state of quiet or tranquillity; freedom from disturbance or agitation;

https://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/peace

Thus Justice is the absence of injustice, and peace can be defined as the absence of conflict.

If the law is meant to intervene when injustice is present, then what shall intervene when conflict is present?

I proposed that this is where peacemaking comes into play. There isn’t simply one solution to creating peace, it can often be complicated based on the situation.

Jesus gave us many examples and as one brother in the class mentioned, he allows a great deal of agency in how we choose to create peace. He said that Captain Moroni chose to take up arms in the defense of his people, whereas the Anti-Lehi-Nephis chose to be slain rather than harm another person.

Both of these options were acceptable and noble in their own ways and required bravery and faith.

But not all conflict is this violent, and many times the extremes can be averted if we deal with the conflict speedily. Jesus taught:

Come to good terms with your accuser quickly, while you are with him on the way to court, so that your accuser will not hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the officer, and you will not be thrown into prison.

Matt. 5:25 NASB

If we let the conflict stew for too long, it can often get worse.

I think that it may also help to use Socratic methods to help diffuse conflict. Here are some things to try based on the Socratic method:

  1. Active Listening:
    • Start by actively listening to the conflicting parties. Let each person express their perspective without interruption. This sets the stage for understanding their viewpoints.
  2. Questioning to Clarify:
    • Use open-ended and clarifying questions to delve deeper into the issues. Ask questions like “Can you tell me more about why you feel this way?” or “What is the root cause of this concern?”
  3. Challenging Assumptions:
    • Encourage individuals to examine their assumptions and beliefs about the conflict. Pose questions like “Have you considered alternative viewpoints?” or “What leads you to believe this is the only solution?”
  4. Identifying Common Ground:
    • Seek areas of agreement or shared values among the conflicting parties. By identifying common ground and areas where you agree, you can then build on those shared values and more clearly understand the real point of divergence.
  5. Empathy and Perspective-Taking:
    • Use questions to foster empathy by asking each party to consider the feelings and perspectives of the other. “How do you think this situation is affecting the other person?” or “What would you do if you were in their shoes?”
  6. Solution-Focused Questions:
    • Shift the dialogue toward problem-solving by asking questions like “What steps can we take to resolve this issue?” or “How can we move forward constructively?”
  7. Balancing Power Dynamics:
    • Ensure that all parties have an equal opportunity to express themselves and participate in the dialogue. Use questions to address any power imbalances.

Being a peacemaker is not easy and I think it goes without saying that a healthy dose of the Holy Spirit, the Mind of God is an essential and perhaps the essential ingredient to help us resolve our conflicts as Jesus would.

As we resolve these conflicts, we allow peace to reign and may forge healthier respect and relationships than existed before.

Contention Peace Peacemaking
Previous ArticleCommandments “given unto our father(s)”
Next Article My first appearance on the Shattering Triangles to discuss 1 Nephi 1-5
Steve Reed

I created oneClimbs as a place to organize my thoughts and share my observations with anyone who might find the information useful. Though I may speak passionately or convincingly in some of this content, PLEASE don't simply take my word alone on anything. Always seek the truth of all things through study and prayer in the name of Jesus Christ.

2 Comments

  1. Michael King on October 1, 2023 7:27 am

    interesting thoughts and ideas. Your description of the Socratic method to resolve conflict was insightful.

    I need to do much more thinking about your earliest comments regarding justice. Not sure that I agree with the perspective, especially considering Alma’s discussion about the requirement of God to be a just God. In our world we see the existence of justice and injustice. The Savior suffered that which was unjust to satisfy the demands of justice in our behalf. I do not by any means pretend to have any “final” or definitive answers to this idea, but I am grateful that these thoughts have left me uneasy and questioning so that I can begin to seek, ponder, and pray to have greater understanding of this idea. What I do know is that God must be just in order to remain a God. With all the injustice that He allows to exist in our world, I do not think that it excludes Him from remaining a just God.

    Reply
    • Steve Reed on October 1, 2023 9:18 am

      Let me clarify, I’m operating under the premise that God is absolutely a God of justice, but the point I’m trying to make is about how we arrive at a state of justice or peace.

      When I say that these are negative principles, I don’t mean negative in the sense that they are bad. I mean that they are not created directly, but come into existence by the elimination of something else.

      This is probably not the best example, but think of darkness, darkness is not created. It is simply the state of things when there’s no light present.

      Similarly, peace and justice are states in which there is no conflict or injustice.

      So my point about being a peacemaker is that we don’t make peace or create it like we would, with other principles, our focus must be on the elimination of the conflict which can happen in a variety of ways.

      Reply
Reply To Steve Reed Cancel Reply

New Post Email Notifications

You can subscribe any time, and I will ONLY use your email to send you new post updates.

POPULAR POSTS
  • Popular
  • Recent
Recent Comments
  • Steve Reed on Restoring the pentagram to its proper place: “Sure, I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t think Satan owns anything, he’s not a creator, he can…”
  • Marcus Smith on Restoring the pentagram to its proper place: “Then you must also reject the hijacking of the word Lucifer as it is simply another name for Venus or…”
  • KC on Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed: “I believe Joseph. Based on what HE wrote, before additions, subtractions, alterations, if anyone knew, he did.”
  • Steve Reed on Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed: “Very cool, Dawn. There’s so much, it’s very vast with no end in sight. We have all these little crumbs…”
  • Steve Reed on The Mother, the Dove, Mercy, and the Holy Spirit: “Another episode should be coming out that I did about Mormon and how it appears that he wrote Alma’s story…”
Blogroll
  • A Traditional Architecture Glossary
  • Academy for Temple Studies
  • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
  • Bruce Charlton's Notions
  • Interpreter Foundation
  • Isaiah Explained
  • Isaiah Explorer
  • Isaiah Institute
  • Isaiah Prophecy
  • Junior Ganymede
  • Latter-day Saint Architecture Blog
  • Latter-day Saint Temples
  • LDSSymbols.com
  • Leading Saints
  • Number in Scripture by E. W. Bullinger
  • Strongs Concordance
  • TempleStudy
  • The Ancient Context of Joseph Smith's Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar
  • Webster's 1828 Dictionary
New Post Email Notifications

You can subscribe any time, and I will ONLY use your email to send you new post updates.

About this Site

I created oneClimbs as a place to organize my thoughts and share my observations with anyone who might find the information useful. All content on this site is considered a work in progress that is often updated when new insights are obtained.

Climbspiration

Obedience opens veils

oneClimbs.com
  • Home
  • All Posts
  • About oneClimbs
  • Contact

LecturesOnFaith.com  //  LDSSymbols.com

© 2025 oneClimbs. All content unique to oneClimbs is fair use. All other content is property of the respective copyright owner. oneClimbs.com is not owned, controlled, or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. All views and opinions are of the authors here who are solely responsible for their content and should not be interpreted as official statements of Church doctrine, belief, or practice, unless specifically stated and correctly referenced.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.