Close Menu
  • The One Climbs Show
    • YouTube
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Show Posts
  • Topics
    • All Posts
    • The Book of Mormon
    • Atonement
    • Symbolism
    • Temple Prep
  • Study Tools
    • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
    • Etymology Dictionary
    • Hebrew 4 Christians
    • Lectures on Faith.com
    • LDSSymbols.com
    • Number in Scripture
    • Isaiah Explorer
    • ScriptureNotes
    • Strong’s Condordance
    • The Book of Isaiah (IIT)
    • Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
  • About
    • About oneClimbs
    • Contact
Trending
  • The Meaning of Isaiah 4:1 and Seven Women Taking Hold of One Man
  • Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed
  • Retaining brightness
  • Sebus, Severed Arms, and Humility Unto Salvation
  • oneClimbs on The Stick of Joseph: Alma’s Sermon
  • What were Nephite “Sanctuaries”?
  • Why the Conventional Interpretation of Jacob 2:30 Falls Short
  • #39 – Insights on Prayer from Incense
oneClimbs.comoneClimbs.com
  • The One Climbs Show
    • YouTube
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Show Posts
  • Topics
    • All Posts
    • The Book of Mormon
    • Atonement
    • Symbolism
    • Temple Prep
  • Study Tools
    • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
    • Etymology Dictionary
    • Hebrew 4 Christians
    • Lectures on Faith.com
    • LDSSymbols.com
    • Number in Scripture
    • Isaiah Explorer
    • ScriptureNotes
    • Strong’s Condordance
    • The Book of Isaiah (IIT)
    • Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
  • About
    • About oneClimbs
    • Contact
oneClimbs.comoneClimbs.com
Home»Articles»Finality Robs Symbols of Their Meaning
Articles November 1, 20152 Mins Read

Finality Robs Symbols of Their Meaning

symbols-meaning

This quote brilliantly sums up a critically important key to understanding symbols.

“One explanation of a symbol that has been given does not preclude someone else seeing beyond that. Symbols were intended to expand our freedom of expression and feelings, not limit them. In suggesting some meanings associated with the symbols on the Salt Lake Temple, it need not be supposed that this constitutes the final word on the matter. Finality robs symbols of their meaning.” – Joseph Fielding McConkie, Symbols of Our Faith, 32

A few weeks ago, I was trying to leave my wife a love note on the fridge with some of the magnetic letters that were scattered everywhere. I quickly realized how limited my ability to express myself would be as I only had one of each letter.

Although I did manage to put some kind of crude message together, imagine trying to write a novel or something! Letters of the alphabet are symbols, and while the letters of the English alphabet don’t have meanings in and of themselves like Hebrew letters do, their real ability to communicate shines when they are combined with other letters to make words and sentences.

As you can see by the photo below, having only 26 letters to work with severely limits one’s capacity to communicate.

symbols-letter

If we think of symbols like letters of the alphabet that form words and sentences, then we are expanding our capacity to be taught by the Spirit.

One of the things that worried me about creating my Symbol Cards and ldsSymbols.com was inadvertantly establishing some kind of authoritative guide that led people to exclude any meanings that didn’t appear in my resources. I didn’t want people to think that the meanings I shared were the only meanings or that some meanings were “better” or “more correct” than others.

I felt like the projects were worthwhile as long as people understood that they represented a starting point, a place to document certain potential meanings that appear to be consistently used in scripture, culture, mathematics, biology, astronomy, etc. I think I need to do a better job at expressing that because it cannot be stated enough.

What do you think?

  • Has symbolism been a tough subject for you to understand?
  • Does McConkie’s quote resonate with your experience or help you see things in a new light?
  • What other qualities about symbolism do you feel are important to take note of?
Archetypes Symbolism Temple Prep
Previous ArticleExperts
Next Article True Security
Steve Reed

I created oneClimbs as a place to organize my thoughts and share my observations with anyone who might find the information useful. Though I may speak passionately or convincingly in some of this content, PLEASE don't simply take my word alone on anything. Always seek the truth of all things through study and prayer in the name of Jesus Christ.

7 Comments

  1. Eternal Skywalker on August 8, 2024 4:48 am

    I like to think of Elohim as a Father/Mother dyad with El as Father and Shadai/Wisdom/Asherah/Counsel as Mother. The book of Abraham calls Elohim a council of gods, with no definite number. Recent conference talks instruct us to counsel with our spouse. John 17 emphasized the unity of the Godhead, which is very similar to the instruction to cleave unto our spouse and none else. “Let us make man in *Our* image” and “male and female created he them” suggests that Eve needed a prototype just as much as Adam did.

    There is no king without a queen. There is no son without a mother. The coronation of every Davidic king mentions the mother’s name.

    In a bit of finality, I believe that 1 Nephi 11:11 and D&C 130:22 exclude the possibility of the Holy Ghost being Heavenly Mother, even though the comforter aspect seems quite feminine.

    All of this bumps the minimum size of the Godhead to 4.

    Reply
  2. Richard J. Nobbe III on January 12, 2016 5:36 pm

    What about the Godhead? Have you ever pondered deeply if God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost are symbols for something even greater? A greater order of things as spoken of in D&C 130? In saying this I don’t mean to be blasphemous in the slightest. I believe that God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost are real, tangible beings. But just like Adam and Eve are symbolic, (even though they too, lived), aren’t the greatest symbols and lessons to be learned in the Godhead itself? These are important questions to ponder. Most members of the Church see the Godhead as little more than the “3 Super Heroes.” We could really do better by indulging in the scriptures, the Lectures on Faith, etc…

    Reply
    • oneclimbs on January 13, 2016 6:06 pm

      As above, so below and vice versa.

      Reply
      • Richard J. Nobbe III on May 7, 2017 6:39 pm

        How do you mean?

        Reply
        • oneclimbs on May 7, 2017 9:07 pm

          While heaven may seem foreign to earth, all things are based on the same patterns. So like you said, the Godhead isn’t just a collection of superheroes. We still don’t know the identity of the third member. We have a Father, a Son, and a…. Hmm, what is missing? Maybe the answer is as plain and obvious as it seems, maybe it is more nuanced. I have some theories.

          Reply
  3. Particle Man on November 2, 2015 10:24 am

    I would nuance the statement by saying “Finality robs symbols of their potential.”

    Regarding this trap of assumed finality, a friend of mine has said: “The power is in the question.”

    It is all too easy to be complacent with one answer or a certain few answers, especially if such are “official.” One’s knowledge and understanding expand the possibilities, not to mention one’s worthiness, willingness, and work to receive personal revelation.

    In the gospel and in the Church, there are official answers; however, this does not to imply that there is not more to it–quite the contrary. When a truth or fact is beyond the present grasp of one, it may be within the grasp of another. It is wisdom that what is taught and how it’s taught should be tailored to the capacity of audience, be it an audience of one or many.

    If one considers an interpretation or an answer as one piece of the puzzle of the omniscience of God, projected into the familiar 2D form, then, on a given subject, two pieces of this puzzle may either connect, overlap, or be divided by some distance. In this distance are the temptation and pitfalls of interpolation as well as the rewards of faithful searching.

    Reply
    • oneclimbs on November 2, 2015 10:48 am

      Very good, I agree with your points. I also think “potential” is a more useful word than “meaning.” What I love about the subject of symbols is that it is one of the best ways to introduce this kind of abstract thinking into the minds of people. It puts the mind into the proper framework to be able to explore the mysteries of God.

      Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

New Post Email Notifications

You can subscribe any time, and I will ONLY use your email to send you new post updates.

POPULAR POSTS
  • Popular
  • Recent
Recent Comments
  • Pam on oneClimbs on The Stick of Joseph: Alma’s Sermon: “Thank you for that insight. I did not pick up on Moroni’s comment being 33:1. Your approach makes total sense…”
  • Steve Reed on oneClimbs on The Stick of Joseph: Alma’s Sermon: “Good catch, and I’ll try to explain. I’m using Alma 32 and 33 which are all part of one sermon,…”
  • Pam on oneClimbs on The Stick of Joseph: Alma’s Sermon: “Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Alma 32/33. These ideas/insights were enlightening and illuminated Alma’s words for me. I…”
  • Greg on Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed: “Thank you Dawn. Well said.”
  • Greg on Lecture Five, the Godhead, and the Light We Missed: “Thank you Steve! So enlightening. We lose things or have them taken away because of our inability or unwillingness to…”
Blogroll
  • A Traditional Architecture Glossary
  • Academy for Temple Studies
  • Book of Mormon Onomasticon
  • Bruce Charlton's Notions
  • Interpreter Foundation
  • Isaiah Explained
  • Isaiah Explorer
  • Isaiah Institute
  • Isaiah Prophecy
  • Junior Ganymede
  • Latter-day Saint Architecture Blog
  • Latter-day Saint Temples
  • LDSSymbols.com
  • Leading Saints
  • Number in Scripture by E. W. Bullinger
  • Strongs Concordance
  • TempleStudy
  • The Ancient Context of Joseph Smith's Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar
  • Webster's 1828 Dictionary
New Post Email Notifications

You can subscribe any time, and I will ONLY use your email to send you new post updates.

About this Site

I created oneClimbs as a place to organize my thoughts and share my observations with anyone who might find the information useful. All content on this site is considered a work in progress that is often updated when new insights are obtained.

Climbspiration

One of the key purposes of any book is remembrance

oneClimbs.com
  • Home
  • All Posts
  • About oneClimbs
  • Contact

LecturesOnFaith.com  //  LDSSymbols.com

© 2025 oneClimbs. All content unique to oneClimbs is fair use. All other content is property of the respective copyright owner. oneClimbs.com is not owned, controlled, or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. All views and opinions are of the authors here who are solely responsible for their content and should not be interpreted as official statements of Church doctrine, belief, or practice, unless specifically stated and correctly referenced.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.